Nicholas Kozeniauskas

I am a research economist at the Bank of Portugal.

I graduated from NYU with a PhD in Economics in 2018.

Fields: macroeconomics, international trade, entrepreneurship.

Curriculum Vitae

Email: nicjkoz(at)gmail.com

Publications

What are Uncertainty Shocks? (with Anna Orlik and Laura Veldkamp)
Journal of Monetary Economics, 2018, 100:1–15
Paper | VoxEU article

Many modern business cycle models use uncertainty shocks to generate aggregate fluctuations. However, uncertainty is measured in a variety of ways. Our analysis shows that the measures are not the same, either statistically or conceptually, raising the question of whether fluctuations in them are actually generated by the same phenomenon. We propose a mechanism that generates realistic micro dispersion (cross-sectional variance of firm-level outcomes), higher-order uncertainty (disagreement) and macro uncertainty (uncertainty about macro outcomes) from changes in macro volatility. If we want to consider ''uncertainty shocks'' as a unified phenomenon, these results show what such a shock might actually entail.

Working Papers

What's Driving the Decline in Entrepreneurship?
January 2018—New version coming soon!
Paper

Recent research shows that entrepreneurial activity has been declining in the US in recent decades. Given the role of entrepreneurship in theories of growth, job creation and economic mobility this has generated considerable concern. This paper investigates why entrepreneurship has declined. It documents that (1) the decline in entrepreneurship has been more pronounced for higher education levels, implying that at least part of the force driving the changes is not skill-neutral, and (2) the size distribution of entrepreneur businesses has been quite stable. Together with a decline in the entrepreneurship rate the second fact implies a shift of economic activity towards non-entrepreneur firms. Guided by this evidence I evaluate explanations for the decline in entrepreneurship based on skill-biased technical change, increases in the fixed costs of businesses which could be due to technological change or increases in regulations, and changes in technology that have benefited large non-entrepreneur firms. I do this using a general equilibrium model of occupational choice calibrated with a rich set of moments on occupations, income distributions and firm size distributions. I find that an increase in fixed costs explains most of the decline in the aggregate entrepreneurship rate and that skill-biased technical change can fully account for the larger decrease in entrepreneurship for more educated people when combined with the other forces.

Covid-19 and Firms: Productivity and Government Policies (with Pedro Moreira and Cezar Santos)
August 2020
Paper

How has the Covid-19 pandemic affected firms and which firms have benefited from government support? Using a panel survey of Portuguese firms conducted during the pandemic matched with pre-Covid administrative data, the results show that the shock was large, but heterogeneous across firms. Though most firms experienced declines in sales, high-productivity firms were more likely to remain open, less likely to cut employment and made less use of government support.

Work in Progress

Demand Learning, Customer Capital and Exporter Dynamics (with Spencer Lyon)

Recent empirical research has documented a rich set of facts about the dynamics of exporters. We develop a general equilibrium trade model in which these dynamics arise endogenously as a result of a customer accumulation friction and imperfect information about demand that can be resolved through learning. The model is used to study how accounting for the dynamics of exporters alters the gains from trade. The main finding is that these dynamics make an economy’s responsiveness to trade liberalization (or protectionism) much more dependent on its initial openness. Economies that are initially very open respond much more to a trade liberalization once exporter dynamics are accounted for, while economies that start with low levels of trade respond much less. For the US, for example, the dynamics of exporters can amplify the gains from lowering trade costs by as much as 30%.